Validation review
Monthly inputs checked against system rules and internal logic.
METHODOLOGY
A single operational KPI framework. Eight scored metrics. Rolling annualised. Independently reviewed by HLB.
The scored layer is built from monthly raw operational inputs, then converted into rolling annualised KPIs and weighted sub-scores. Policy declarations, narrative claims and self-assessed indicators do not form part of the score.
This is intentional. The aim is to produce a defensible performance record for procurement, owner reporting, lender review, disclosure and audit-related use.
Every property shares the same eight scored KPIs. Each is calculated as a rolling annualised value and scored against a benchmark corridor.
| # | KPI | Direction | Unit | Formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Energy Intensity | Lower better | kWh/m²/yr | Rolling annualised total energy ÷ built-up area |
| 02 | Water Intensity | Lower better | L/m²/yr | Rolling annualised total water ÷ built-up area |
| 03 | Waste Intensity | Lower better | kg/m²/yr | Rolling annualised total waste ÷ built-up area |
| 04 | Food Waste Ratio | Lower better | % | Rolling annualised food waste ÷ food purchased |
| 05 | Renewable Energy Share | Higher better | % | Rolling annualised renewable ÷ total energy |
| 06 | Waste Diversion Rate | Higher better | % | Rolling annualised diverted ÷ total waste |
| 07 | Recycled / Reused Water Share | Higher better | % | Rolling annualised recycled water ÷ total water |
| 08 | Training per FTE | Higher better | hrs/FTE | Rolling annualised training hours ÷ rolling average FTE |
Each of the eight KPIs maps to a UN Sustainable Development Goal target. The mapping shows which goals a property's reported performance relates to. It is not a claim that a property has achieved, or contributes a measured amount to, any goal.
| KPI | UN SDG target |
|---|---|
| Energy Intensity | SDG 7.3: improve energy efficiency. Relates indirectly to SDG 13 (climate action). |
| Renewable Energy Share | SDG 7.2: increase the share of renewable energy. Relates indirectly to SDG 13 (climate action). |
| Water Intensity | SDG 6.4: increase water-use efficiency. |
| Recycled / Reused Water Share | SDG 6.3: increase recycling and safe reuse of water. |
| Waste Intensity | SDG 12.5: reduce waste generation. |
| Waste Diversion Rate | SDG 12.5: reduce waste through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse. |
| Food Waste Ratio | SDG 12.3: halve food waste. |
| Training per FTE | SDG 4.4: increase skills for employment and decent jobs. Relates to SDG 8 (decent work). |
All scored data enters the system as monthly raw operational inputs.
From that point, Tuu applies a rolling annualised calculation method from the first month onward. The system does not wait for a full twelve months before producing a comparable result. Instead, it annualises available monthly history until a full rolling year is established.
The purpose is to reduce seasonality distortion, limit timing manipulation and produce more stable performance curves over time.
Intensity KPI = rolling annualised total ÷ built-up area Share KPI = rolling annualised subset ÷ rolling annualised parent Training per FTE = rolling annualised training hours ÷ rolling average FTE
The overall score is the weighted sum of the eight KPI sub-scores. Tuu does not apply policy modifiers, narrative overlays or internal carbon calculations in the Rating.
For some KPIs, lower values are better. For others, higher values are better. The corridor runs from the weak end to leading-practice performance.
A score of 100 is reserved for performance at or near the leading edge of credible operational practice. It does not represent an industry average. A score of 0 identifies performance at or beyond the weak end of the benchmark corridor — not non-compliance.
Each KPI’s corridor runs from the weak end to leading practice. Hover or focus any band to see the formula and the sample property’s position.
Energy Intensity
Lower better
Water Intensity
Lower better
Waste Intensity
Lower better
Food Waste Ratio
Lower better
Renewable Energy Share
Higher better
Waste Diversion Rate
Higher better
Recycled / Reused Water Share
Higher better
Training per FTE
Higher better
Sample property data. Verified property data remains confidential.
Tuu's benchmark corridors are informed by hospitality operational datasets, engineering reference frameworks, sector guidance and management-system standards. The aim is to ground benchmark treatment in observed operational performance and credible technical context.
Corridor treatment is informed by the Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index for observed operational range and by ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 100, CIBSE TM46 and the U.S. DOE Commercial Reference Buildings programme for engineering reference context. [1] [5] [6] [7]
Corridor treatment is informed by the Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index, the U.S. EPA Portfolio Manager Water Use Intensity guidance, and the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance's Hotel Water Measurement Initiative. [1] [10] [11]
Corridor treatment is informed by the Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index and the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance's Hotel Waste Measurement Methodology. [1] [13]
Corridor treatment is informed by WRAP's Guardians of Grub measurement guidance and the UN Environment Programme Food Waste Index Report 2024. [14] [15]
Every monthly numeric input that feeds a scored KPI must be traceable to a primary source record or controlled aggregate. Typical examples include utility bills, invoices, meter logs, haulier or weighbridge records, training logs, payroll records and other operational source documents relevant to the reporting period.
Supporting documents also matter, but they do a different job. They help define scope, support framework mapping and assist documentary review. They do not change KPI calculations.
When an operator uploads a source document, the Tuu Performance Hub reads it and populates the relevant entry — the figure, the period and the source it came from — for the operator to approve. Every figure is confirmed by a person before it enters a verified cycle, and HLB reviews against the same source document. Automated reading speeds the trace. It does not replace it.
Source-document reading uses Microsoft Azure Document Intelligence, the same extraction service used in regulated finance and insurance workflows. It reads what the document shows, with the source visible — it does not generate or predict values.
Figures that exceed their parent totals, unsupported inputs and missing periods are flagged for review before a cycle closes; corrections remain traceable.
HLB International acts as the independent verification partner for Tuu Verified. HLB is a global network of independent accounting and advisory firms.
Monthly inputs checked against system rules and internal logic.
Completeness, correctness, authenticity and period coverage assessed.
Each scored KPI followed from score output to rolling KPI value, to monthly input, to source evidence.
KPI values, benchmark interpolation, scoring logic and display behaviour reviewed.
Each completed cycle produces a time-stamped Evidence Pack with a unique Record ID and the verified KPI dataset, registered on the BlockMark Registry.
All KPI definitions, formulas, benchmark corridors, weights and validation rules are version-controlled. When methodology changes, a new framework version is created. Historical scores are not retroactively altered.
Each verification cycle produces an immutable, time-stamped dataset and Record ID, preserving continuity for audit, procurement, lender review and longitudinal analysis.
The Tuu Verified Smart Trust Mark is issued to a named property for a stated period. It stays valid only while the property keeps its verification current.
Tuu suspends the mark if a property stops submitting its monthly data and evidence, if a quarterly review cannot be completed, or if the independent review finds exceptions that the property does not resolve. Tuu withdraws the mark if data or evidence is found to be misrepresented, or if the property no longer meets the scheme's requirements.
Tuu tells the property why, and where an issue can be corrected, gives it the chance to correct it before the mark is suspended.
Every suspension or withdrawal is recorded on the BlockMark Registry, and the property's public status updates immediately. While suspended, a property may not display the mark or make claims based on it. The mark is reinstated only after a completed review.
The Tuu Performance Hub also shows each property two estimates: its carbon and its costs. They are not part of the Tuu Rating, are not reviewed by HLB and are not in the Evidence Pack. They are labelled as estimates wherever they appear. They add context to a property's Tuu Verified data and Evidence Pack; they do not replace them.
Carbon is the energy a property reports each month (purchased electricity and fuels, in kWh) multiplied by an emission factor for each source: the country's grid factor for electricity, which is location based, and IPCC 2006 factors for fuels. Renewable electricity is not deducted, because it is part of the energy already reported. The estimate is refined when the property adds its occupied room nights. It is shown as a Proof Provided Estimate when its electricity and room nights match the bill and occupancy report the property attached. That is supporting data, not verification.
Costs are what each month cost. Tuu uses the property's own bill amounts where it has added them, and its usage at standard rates for its country where it has not. Food wasted is priced from the property's own food spend per kilogram, and waste collection from its own bill. Each cost is compared with what similar properties of the same type spend for the same size: per occupied room night when enough of them report room nights, otherwise per square metre of built-up area. The comparison needs at least three similar properties and only ever uses their middle figure, never another property's own.
Standard rates are published business prices for each country in Southeast Asia and Hong Kong, for example electricity tariffs from Thailand's Energy Regulatory Commission, Vietnam's EVN, Malaysia's TNB, Indonesia's PLN, the Philippines' Meralco, Singapore's SP Group and Hong Kong's CLP Power. Tuu uses them to start with, but a property's actual bill amounts always replace them.
Grid factors for electricity are the latest national figure each country's own agency publishes, such as Thailand's Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (0.4750 kg CO2e per kWh), Vietnam's Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, Malaysia's Energy Commission, Indonesia's Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, the Philippines' Department of Energy and Singapore's Energy Market Authority. Where a country has no published figure, Tuu uses the International Energy Agency's world average.
Renewable electricity is valued at what the property pays per kWh for electricity: its bill amount divided by its kWh, or the standard rate until it adds a bill amount. Where the renewable electricity comes from the property's own panels, that is roughly what it saved. Where it comes through a green tariff, it is already part of the bill, so the figure is a guide rather than money saved.
Bill amounts and occupied room nights are optional. Leaving them out never affects a property's Tuu Rating.
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance
https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/ISO 14001 — Environmental management systems
International Organization for Standardization
https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.htmlISO 20121 — Event sustainability management systems
International Organization for Standardization
https://www.iso.org/standard/86389.htmlANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 100 — Energy Efficiency in Existing Buildings
ASHRAE
https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/standard-100CIBSE TM46 — Energy Benchmarks
Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers
https://www.cibse.org/knowledge-research/knowledge-portal/tm46-energy-benchmarksCommercial Reference Buildings
U.S. Department of Energy
https://www.energy.gov/cmei/buildings/commercial-reference-buildingsGreen Lodging Trends Report 2024
Global Sustainable Tourism Council
https://www.gstc.org/green-lodging-trends-report-2024Net Zero Methodology for Hotels
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance
https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/net-zero-methodology-for-hotelsWhat is Water Use Intensity? — Portfolio Manager
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/benchmark/understand-metrics/what-water-use-intensity-wuiHotel Water Measurement Initiative
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance
https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/hotel-water-measurement-initiativeWater Stewardship for Hotel Companies
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance
https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/water-stewardship-for-hotel-companiesHotel Waste Measurement Methodology
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance
https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/hwmm/Food Waste Index Report 2024
UN Environment Programme
https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/food-waste-index-report-2024Best Environmental Management Practice in the Tourism Sector
European Commission
https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/publications/best-environmental-management-practice-tourism-sector_enRainwater and Grey Water Recycling
One Planet Network
https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/knowledge-centre/resources/rainwater-and-grey-water-recycling