METHODOLOGY

How Tuu Verified works.

A single operational KPI framework. Eight scored metrics. Rolling annualised. Independently reviewed by HLB.

  • One shared KPI framework
  • Operational performance only
  • Independently reviewed by HLB

Tuu measures operational performance only.

The scored layer is built from monthly raw operational inputs, then converted into rolling annualised KPIs and weighted sub-scores. Policy declarations, narrative claims and self-assessed indicators do not form part of the score.

This is intentional. The aim is to produce a defensible performance record for procurement, owner reporting, lender review, disclosure and audit-related use.

Eight scored KPIs.

Every property shares the same eight scored KPIs. Each is calculated as a rolling annualised value and scored against a benchmark corridor.

#KPIDirectionUnitFormula
01Energy IntensityLower betterkWh/m²/yrRolling annualised total energy ÷ built-up area
02Water IntensityLower betterL/m²/yrRolling annualised total water ÷ built-up area
03Waste IntensityLower betterkg/m²/yrRolling annualised total waste ÷ built-up area
04Food Waste RatioLower better%Rolling annualised food waste ÷ food purchased
05Renewable Energy ShareHigher better%Rolling annualised renewable ÷ total energy
06Waste Diversion RateHigher better%Rolling annualised diverted ÷ total waste
07Recycled / Reused Water ShareHigher better%Rolling annualised recycled water ÷ total water
08Training per FTEHigher betterhrs/FTERolling annualised training hours ÷ rolling average FTE

Mapping to the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Each of the eight KPIs maps to a UN Sustainable Development Goal target. The mapping shows which goals a property's reported performance relates to. It is not a claim that a property has achieved, or contributes a measured amount to, any goal.

KPIUN SDG target
Energy IntensitySDG 7.3: improve energy efficiency. Relates indirectly to SDG 13 (climate action).
Renewable Energy ShareSDG 7.2: increase the share of renewable energy. Relates indirectly to SDG 13 (climate action).
Water IntensitySDG 6.4: increase water-use efficiency.
Recycled / Reused Water ShareSDG 6.3: increase recycling and safe reuse of water.
Waste IntensitySDG 12.5: reduce waste generation.
Waste Diversion RateSDG 12.5: reduce waste through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse.
Food Waste RatioSDG 12.3: halve food waste.
Training per FTESDG 4.4: increase skills for employment and decent jobs. Relates to SDG 8 (decent work).

One shared operational dataset.

Tuu Verified operates on one shared operational dataset. The core scoring logic, benchmark treatment and verification method are common to every property.

Five operational areas, organised monthly:

  1. 01

    Energy — Purchased electricity, renewable energy and relevant fuels converted to kWh before entry.

  2. 02

    Water — Total water use and recycled or reused water.

  3. 03

    Waste — Total waste and diverted waste.

  4. 04

    Food — Food purchased and food waste.

  5. 05

    People — Training hours and full-time equivalent headcount.

Built-up area is the fixed denominator used for area-normalised KPIs unless a controlled update is issued.

Rolling annualised, from month one.

All scored data enters the system as monthly raw operational inputs.

From that point, Tuu applies a rolling annualised calculation method from the first month onward. The system does not wait for a full twelve months before producing a comparable result. Instead, it annualises available monthly history until a full rolling year is established.

The purpose is to reduce seasonality distortion, limit timing manipulation and produce more stable performance curves over time.

Intensity KPI    = rolling annualised total ÷ built-up area
Share KPI        = rolling annualised subset ÷ rolling annualised parent
Training per FTE = rolling annualised training hours ÷ rolling average FTE

The overall score is the weighted sum of the eight KPI sub-scores. Tuu does not apply policy modifiers, narrative overlays or internal carbon calculations in the Rating.

Each KPI is scored against a benchmark corridor.

For some KPIs, lower values are better. For others, higher values are better. The corridor runs from the weak end to leading-practice performance.

A score of 100 is reserved for performance at or near the leading edge of credible operational practice. It does not represent an industry average. A score of 0 identifies performance at or beyond the weak end of the benchmark corridor — not non-compliance.

The benchmark corridor.

Each KPI’s corridor runs from the weak end to leading practice. Hover or focus any band to see the formula and the sample property’s position.

  • Energy Intensity

    Lower better

    ≥ 900 kWh/m²/yr≤ 150 kWh/m²/yr
    WeakLeading practice
  • Water Intensity

    Lower better

    ≥ 9000 L/m²/yr≤ 1500 L/m²/yr
    WeakLeading practice
  • Waste Intensity

    Lower better

    ≥ 80 kg/m²/yr≤ 5 kg/m²/yr
    WeakLeading practice
  • Food Waste Ratio

    Lower better

    ≥ 40 %≤ 5 %
    WeakLeading practice
  • Renewable Energy Share

    Higher better

    0 %100 %
    WeakLeading practice
  • Waste Diversion Rate

    Higher better

    0 %90 %
    WeakLeading practice
  • Recycled / Reused Water Share

    Higher better

    0 %60 %
    WeakLeading practice
  • Training per FTE

    Higher better

    0 hrs/FTE40 hrs/FTE
    WeakLeading practice

Sample property data. Verified property data remains confidential.

Benchmark sources.

Tuu's benchmark corridors are informed by hospitality operational datasets, engineering reference frameworks, sector guidance and management-system standards. The aim is to ground benchmark treatment in observed operational performance and credible technical context.

Energy Intensity

Corridor treatment is informed by the Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index for observed operational range and by ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 100, CIBSE TM46 and the U.S. DOE Commercial Reference Buildings programme for engineering reference context. [1] [5] [6] [7]

Water Intensity

Corridor treatment is informed by the Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index, the U.S. EPA Portfolio Manager Water Use Intensity guidance, and the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance's Hotel Water Measurement Initiative. [1] [10] [11]

Waste Intensity

Corridor treatment is informed by the Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index and the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance's Hotel Waste Measurement Methodology. [1] [13]

Food Waste Ratio

Corridor treatment is informed by WRAP's Guardians of Grub measurement guidance and the UN Environment Programme Food Waste Index Report 2024. [14] [15]

Renewable Energy Share

Corridor treatment is informed by the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance's Net Zero Methodology for Hotels and the GSTC Green Lodging Trends Report 2024 for observed industry distribution. [9] [8]

Waste Diversion Rate

Corridor treatment is informed by the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance's Hotel Waste Measurement Methodology and the European Commission's Best Environmental Management Practice in the Tourism Sector reference document. [13] [16]

Recycled / Reused Water Share

Corridor treatment is informed by the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance's Water Stewardship for Hotel Companies guidance, the One Planet Network's Rainwater and Grey Water Recycling resource, and U.S. EPA Portfolio Manager water-use guidance for reference context. [12] [17] [10]

Training per FTE

Corridor treatment is informed by training-coverage expectations within ISO 14001 and ISO 20121 management-system standards, alongside observed industry training-investment ranges from the GSTC Green Lodging Trends Report 2024. [3] [4] [8]

Every input traces to evidence.

Every monthly numeric input that feeds a scored KPI must be traceable to a primary source record or controlled aggregate. Typical examples include utility bills, invoices, meter logs, haulier or weighbridge records, training logs, payroll records and other operational source documents relevant to the reporting period.

Supporting documents also matter, but they do a different job. They help define scope, support framework mapping and assist documentary review. They do not change KPI calculations.

Reading source documents.

When an operator uploads a source document, the Tuu Performance Hub reads it and populates the relevant entry — the figure, the period and the source it came from — for the operator to approve. Every figure is confirmed by a person before it enters a verified cycle, and HLB reviews against the same source document. Automated reading speeds the trace. It does not replace it.

Source-document reading uses Microsoft Azure Document Intelligence, the same extraction service used in regulated finance and insurance workflows. It reads what the document shows, with the source visible — it does not generate or predict values.

Integrity rules

  • Figures that exceed their parent totals, unsupported inputs and missing periods are flagged for review before a cycle closes; corrections remain traceable.

Independent review by HLB.

HLB International acts as the independent verification partner for Tuu Verified. HLB is a global network of independent accounting and advisory firms.

HLB

Their review covers four areas:

Validation review

Monthly inputs checked against system rules and internal logic.

Evidence review

Completeness, correctness, authenticity and period coverage assessed.

Traceability testing

Each scored KPI followed from score output to rolling KPI value, to monthly input, to source evidence.

Calculation review

KPI values, benchmark interpolation, scoring logic and display behaviour reviewed.

Each completed cycle produces a time-stamped Evidence Pack with a unique Record ID and the verified KPI dataset, registered on the BlockMark Registry.

Versioned. Time-stamped. Immutable.

All KPI definitions, formulas, benchmark corridors, weights and validation rules are version-controlled. When methodology changes, a new framework version is created. Historical scores are not retroactively altered.

Each verification cycle produces an immutable, time-stamped dataset and Record ID, preserving continuity for audit, procurement, lender review and longitudinal analysis.

Suspension and withdrawal.

The Tuu Verified Smart Trust Mark is issued to a named property for a stated period. It stays valid only while the property keeps its verification current.

Tuu suspends the mark if a property stops submitting its monthly data and evidence, if a quarterly review cannot be completed, or if the independent review finds exceptions that the property does not resolve. Tuu withdraws the mark if data or evidence is found to be misrepresented, or if the property no longer meets the scheme's requirements.

Tuu tells the property why, and where an issue can be corrected, gives it the chance to correct it before the mark is suspended.

Every suspension or withdrawal is recorded on the BlockMark Registry, and the property's public status updates immediately. While suspended, a property may not display the mark or make claims based on it. The mark is reinstated only after a completed review.

Carbon and cost estimates (not rated).

The Tuu Performance Hub also shows each property two estimates: its carbon and its costs. They are not part of the Tuu Rating, are not reviewed by HLB and are not in the Evidence Pack. They are labelled as estimates wherever they appear. They add context to a property's Tuu Verified data and Evidence Pack; they do not replace them.

Carbon is the energy a property reports each month (purchased electricity and fuels, in kWh) multiplied by an emission factor for each source: the country's grid factor for electricity, which is location based, and IPCC 2006 factors for fuels. Renewable electricity is not deducted, because it is part of the energy already reported. The estimate is refined when the property adds its occupied room nights. It is shown as a Proof Provided Estimate when its electricity and room nights match the bill and occupancy report the property attached. That is supporting data, not verification.

Costs are what each month cost. Tuu uses the property's own bill amounts where it has added them, and its usage at standard rates for its country where it has not. Food wasted is priced from the property's own food spend per kilogram, and waste collection from its own bill. Each cost is compared with what similar properties of the same type spend for the same size: per occupied room night when enough of them report room nights, otherwise per square metre of built-up area. The comparison needs at least three similar properties and only ever uses their middle figure, never another property's own.

Standard rates are published business prices for each country in Southeast Asia and Hong Kong, for example electricity tariffs from Thailand's Energy Regulatory Commission, Vietnam's EVN, Malaysia's TNB, Indonesia's PLN, the Philippines' Meralco, Singapore's SP Group and Hong Kong's CLP Power. Tuu uses them to start with, but a property's actual bill amounts always replace them.

Grid factors for electricity are the latest national figure each country's own agency publishes, such as Thailand's Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (0.4750 kg CO2e per kWh), Vietnam's Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, Malaysia's Energy Commission, Indonesia's Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, the Philippines' Department of Energy and Singapore's Energy Market Authority. Where a country has no published figure, Tuu uses the International Energy Agency's world average.

Renewable electricity is valued at what the property pays per kWh for electricity: its bill amount divided by its kWh, or the standard rate until it adds a bill amount. Where the renewable electricity comes from the property's own panels, that is roughly what it saved. Where it comes through a green tariff, it is already part of the bill, so the figure is a guide rather than money saved.

Bill amounts and occupied room nights are optional. Leaving them out never affects a property's Tuu Rating.

Sources cited.

  1. 01

    Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index

    Greenview

    https://greenview.sg/resources/chsb-index/
  2. 02

    Sustainable Hospitality Alliance

    Sustainable Hospitality Alliance

    https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/
  3. 03

    ISO 14001 — Environmental management systems

    International Organization for Standardization

    https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html
  4. 04

    ISO 20121 — Event sustainability management systems

    International Organization for Standardization

    https://www.iso.org/standard/86389.html
  5. 05

    ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 100 — Energy Efficiency in Existing Buildings

    ASHRAE

    https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/standard-100
  6. 06

    CIBSE TM46 — Energy Benchmarks

    Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers

    https://www.cibse.org/knowledge-research/knowledge-portal/tm46-energy-benchmarks
  7. 07

    Commercial Reference Buildings

    U.S. Department of Energy

    https://www.energy.gov/cmei/buildings/commercial-reference-buildings
  8. 08

    Green Lodging Trends Report 2024

    Global Sustainable Tourism Council

    https://www.gstc.org/green-lodging-trends-report-2024
  9. 09

    Net Zero Methodology for Hotels

    Sustainable Hospitality Alliance

    https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/net-zero-methodology-for-hotels
  10. 10

    What is Water Use Intensity? — Portfolio Manager

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/benchmark/understand-metrics/what-water-use-intensity-wui
  11. 11

    Hotel Water Measurement Initiative

    Sustainable Hospitality Alliance

    https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/hotel-water-measurement-initiative
  12. 12

    Water Stewardship for Hotel Companies

    Sustainable Hospitality Alliance

    https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/water-stewardship-for-hotel-companies
  13. 13

    Hotel Waste Measurement Methodology

    Sustainable Hospitality Alliance

    https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/hwmm/
  14. 14
  15. 15

    Food Waste Index Report 2024

    UN Environment Programme

    https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/food-waste-index-report-2024
  16. 16

    Best Environmental Management Practice in the Tourism Sector

    European Commission

    https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/publications/best-environmental-management-practice-tourism-sector_en
  17. 17